[Previo por Fecha] [Siguiente por Fecha] [Previo por Hilo] [Siguiente por Hilo]
[Hilos de Discusión] [Fecha] [Tema] [Autor]So, maybe I used the wrong word. I think of counter-terrorists as being against terrorism but using their methods, and I think of Debian as being counter-elitist (elitist as in Microsoft) but using Microsoft-type threatening tactics.
Ten years ago, when you all were babies and the computer world was much different, people used to say Debian was for computer snobs only. Like the people from big universities like MIT and Harvard. A friend told me, if I couldn't compile my own programs from source, I shouldn't run Debian.
I am somewhat older than you. Debian may have developed a sense of humor since then, but I have stayed away.
Here is the provision from the GNU license.
b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in
whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any
part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third
parties under the terms of this License.
Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3) wrote:
David Moreno Garza, who happens to be smarter than you, thinks:
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 15:50, Susan R. Cragin wrote:
I think it depends on the list. Debian, for instance, houses a bunch of
counter-elitists :). And I can't even imagine belonging to Yoper...
But my favorite list is yours.
What do you mean by counter-elitists?
No se pongan el saco.. x-D
Just curious.
--
David Moreno Garza <damog en damog net
http://www.damog.net/
PGP 356E16CD - 84F0 E180 8AF6 E8D0 842F B520 63F3 08DB 356E 16CD